As a freelance writer, there’s always been a part of me that constantly worries about a new form of technology rendering my job obsolete.
The big one is artificial intelligence. It’s something that’s been talked about for years, but it’s become all-encompassing in 2025. Everywhere you look, companies are pivoting towards AI, whether it’s Microsoft’s Copilot, Meta AI or ChatGPT. These companies have all sought to reassure workers that AI is only being used to streamline certain menial tasks, not to replace them.But with so many layoffs happening around the world, it’s easy to see why people are worried.
I’ve been vaguely aware of generative AI tools like ChatGPT, which are designed to produce texts and images, among other outputs. While there is still that part of me that worries, I’ve always had the belief that I’ll find work because my own writing is better than an AI.
Having tried out generative AI myself, I now have a new worry: that it might not matter.
Note here that generative AI (original and creative) is bolder than traditional AI (analytical and predictive).
My experience judging generative AI
Despite my ethical objections to generative AI, I figured that I should at least try it out to see what exactly I was dealing with. As part of a recent article about how students are using AI to study, I decided to experiment with a tool to see what it was capable of.
My request was simple: Explain the pros and cons of using AI to study and present it in a table format. It did that, but it didn’t do it very well.
Comments
Be the first to share your thoughts!
We value diverse perspectives and respectful debate.